![]() |
||
|
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Ghetto Booty XXL Volume 2
GHETTO BOOTY XXL VOLUME 2 It's only the second time we've paid for porn via DirecTV; the first time I tried being frugal and ordered one of the cheapest movies I could find; of course, it sucked, mainly because the action and talent didn't at all match the description and title. Annoying! So this time I splurged on a movie with a standard price ($10.99) and a title that I thought would mean I couldn't go wrong: Ghetto Booty XXL Volume 2. The description ("pretty girls make men smile") didn't provide any indication what kind of action we'd find, so I hoped there would be a lot of taunting booty-clapping, jiggling, walking and dancing before any sex took place. Of course, I was almost completely wrong. If I'm paying to see a girl's ass, why would I want to see 20 seconds of it and then two minutes of her pussy VIEWED FROM THE FRONT? I want to see it from behind -- hello! If I'm paying to see a girl's ass, why in the world would I want to see a blowjob in every single scene? And why in the world would every single scene culminate in a cumshot to the face or delivered on the tongue instead of shot all over the ghetto booty I obviously want to see? I totally don't get it. I love blowjobs and all, but it's disappointing when you were anticipating lots of ass, not lots of head. I am so sick of the ubiquitous hurried facials, particularly when there are more obvious and convenient places to shoot a load (like, on someone's ass when the people buying the movie obviously LIKE asses). Obviously we need to research our purchases a little bit more instead of hoping for the best based on the inane descriptions provided on the tv guide; these kinds of mistakes make it clearer to me why some porn consumers become porn collectors and develop a certain level of expertise regarding their favorite performers, studios, etc. You really have to do some homework to find porn that delivers what you like best. I'd say that 85% of the moving-picture porn I've rented or purchased in my life has been a disappointment. I don't mean that I have high standards and was expecting greatness, I mean it was either totally boring and/or an actual turn-OFF. The kind of stuff where you practically have to force yourself to masturbate to it just so you feel like you're getting your money's worth. That's really saying a lot considering I've happily masturbated to images of FRUIT on a pbs gardening program. A couple of the biggest turn-offs for me in this Ghetto Booty movie are the same things that turn me off in most porn: unlubricated pussies being fucked and unprotected sex. Nothing turns me off more than seeing a cock shoved into a dry pussy. I fucking HATE it. Lube is not that expensive so BUY SOME AND USE IT. Oh, I know that a lot of guys freak out when lube is used because they think it's an admission of non-arousal, but isn't the bone-dry pussy and the talent's totally bored expression and faked moans a tip-off? Are guys really able to convince themselves porn performer's are totally into it UNLESS a bottle of lube is introduced and then the whole illusion is destroyed? And as far as unprotected sex goes, I actually do get more aroused watching people fuck without condoms BUT I just wish they would say something at the beginning to assure us that the people were tested and stuff. Maybe it's a chick thing, but I worry about those girls, particularly when they are being FUCKED DRY which makes risky sex even riskier. I find myself sympathizing with the pain the performers are enduring and worrying about their safety rather than being aroused, and it's not just because they are women -- I feel the same way seeing men fucked up the ass without condoms or lube, or having their penises mauled by insensitive hands or teeth. And honestly it's not that I don't like watching certain kinds of rough sex (gagging, choking, spanking, etc), but pointless pain in vanilla engagements just makes me feel so chapped and tense. I think a lot of women feel the same way I do about stupid-things-in-porn and it could be one of the many and complex reasons women get upset when their male partners enjoy porn so much; how is it that men can enjoy porn without their empathy getting in the way? THOSE ARE DRY PUSSIES!! Isn't that anti-erotic to them? Isn't it a turn off knowing that person is in pain? And don't tell me just because guys don't have their own pussies that they can't recognize genuine pain when the performer is saying "Owww!" and cringing when a big fat dick is stuffed in her DRY PUSSY. For a lot of wives and girlfriends it can be really upsetting to suspect that maybe your boyfriend or husband is turned on by things that cause women pain, like, you know -- DRY PUSSY. Or that maybe he's too stupid to notice it or just completely lacks the empathy or imagination to give a shit. Fortunately I have never been in a relationship with a guy who was turned on by dry pussy (I think Tucker was even more bored watching Ghetto Booty than I was), but the fact that this dry-pussy porn sells and is so rampant does make me view men-in-general with a high degree of suspicion and anger. On the other hand, I think a lot of men just tolerate bad porn rather than lauding it as great; they recognize it's lame but hey -- there aren't a lot of alternatives and it still "works" for them, so even though they might understand that it's fucked up and prefer something better, they just take what's provided. Still, I know that a whole lot of guys honestly *don't* have any empathy or understanding of what they're watching, and I know this because I deal with them by the thousands in group shows (and observe them in other people's shows). The things many of them say indicate to me that they are dangerously ignorant and devoid of compassion. I can understand why some women get all crazy-mad about porn, then, when it brings out some major character flaws in men. Too bad most women who do get all crazy-mad about porn can't articulate (or are unwilling to recognize) what the REAL problems are (men being encouraged to be totally ignorant of women's bodies, not having empathy for others, etc.) and instead like to pretend that PORN MAKES MEN that way; they like to pretend that if we got rid of porn and all the women who make money in porn, then men would be perfect little angels!! Good luck, you stupid bitches. ***** I really would rather spend money on internet porn paysite memberships rather than whole movies, but we don't have a fancy setup to watch internet porn on a computer hooked up to television in our bedroom; our computers don't have big monitors and they're not anywhere near a bed so if Tucker and I are going to watch porn together (or alone in a comfortable bed), it has to be on dvd, vhs, or ordered via satellite. It's kind of amazing how cheap internet porn is compared to buying one movie at a time. I guess if I want to get serious about consuming porn myself, we're going to have to upgrade our bedroom's "entertainment center" to include whatever-we-need to view internet stuff on tv, or get a big monitor and another computer or wireless or whatever-the-hell people do nowadays. I'm so behind-the-times. Labels: education, gender issues, health, porn consumers, PORNOGRAPHY, relationships, TURN-OFFS |
||
4 Comments:
I agree with what you're saying about the stupid stuff in porn. I'm a fan of the "POV" stuff; I like to imagine being the one doing the fucking. Seeing the dick going in a dry pussy, I can't help thinking how much it would hurt my dick! Total turnoff. Give me a wet pussy any time, even if it's from lube. As for the safe sex, sure, most guys fantasizing about fucking imagine it bare, so I get it being that way in porn. Coincidentally, I just yesterday watched a DVD called "Interactive Gangbang with Katja Kassin"; in an interview on the DVD she mentions the need to use safe sex practices, and that the only reason the porn actors don't is because of the HIV testing they do. I thought it was pretty cool.
That's a really interesting perspective that I hadn't thought of (entering dry pussy being painful for men, too). I totally get the bareback thing, though, since I also prefer seeing condomless cocks. Still, while the testing is cool and all, it really doesn't guarantee safety and I don't think they test for hep (at least, they didn't when Tucker and I did our AIM testing).
Hi Trixie,
I read your comment about not wanting too see hurried facial cum shots all the time. I must tell you, as a massive consumer of much hardcore porn for two decades, I think your comments probably reflect normal differences between guys and girls. Most guys, me included, LOVE to see the facial cumshot. Not even sure why. But it's nearly (not quite but nearly) the whole world, especially if the girl is hot and the load is huge and well splattered on her face. The fact that nearly all scenes end in a facial, and there are so many sub-genres (sp?) of this fetish, speak to the fatc that men just are wired this way. Not sure why.
I'm not complaining about facials or even saying that I do not like seeing a pop shot to the face, what I'm saying is that when you make titles advertising a very specific thing (ghetto booty, in this case), you should deliver. Not delivering even one cumshot onto a booty in five scenes is ridiculous.
I don't think this has anything to do with differences between men and women -- I'm positive that a man with a big butt fetish would find this just as annoying as I did. Also, I do not think nearly-all hardcore scenes end in a facial specifically because that's what all men like best; I think there are a lot of factors contributing to facials being shot so much, one being that it's just easier to shoot than anything else.
There are plenty of men who would like to see more variety in where external cumshots are delivered, and there are plenty of women who like to see facials.
As far as WHY so many men like seeing facials so much, I think it's because they love cock and they dream of drowning in man chowder. Just kidding (sorta). I think it varies from person to person, but I also think men have been programmed/brainwashed by porn into liking it much more than they naturally would. I'm not saying that there aren't naturally appealing reasons to love facials, or that tons of guys wouldn't naturally be diehard facial fans with or without porn reinforcement, I just think far fewer men would be "into" facials if they'd never seen one in a porno.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home